Chris Cillizza of The
Washington Post shared a chart today from
Republican lobbyist Bruce Mehlman, purporting to highlight the existence of TWO
AMERICAS:
This "dichotomy"
isn't wearing any clothes.
The table only purports
to show the difference in opinion between GOP primary voters and Democratic
primary voters. Those folks are a very small part of the American
citizenry.
Cillizza, Mehlman, and others so enraptured with the “Two Americas” narrative that they’re cramming these polling figures into it are forgetting about 72.3% of our voting-age citizenry.
In the 2008 presidential nominating process, which was an unusually active nominating season, just a little over one quarter (27.7%) of voting age citizens participated. About 57 million voters participated in the nominating process (Harvard) - out of 206 million voting-age citizens (US Census Bureau, see p. 2.)
When it came to the November General Election, 15 million registered voters didn’t vote (same, p. 14.) Another 30 million weren’t registered to vote at all (same.)
Cillizza, Mehlman, and others so enraptured with the “Two Americas” narrative that they’re cramming these polling figures into it are forgetting about 72.3% of our voting-age citizenry.
In the 2008 presidential nominating process, which was an unusually active nominating season, just a little over one quarter (27.7%) of voting age citizens participated. About 57 million voters participated in the nominating process (Harvard) - out of 206 million voting-age citizens (US Census Bureau, see p. 2.)
When it came to the November General Election, 15 million registered voters didn’t vote (same, p. 14.) Another 30 million weren’t registered to vote at all (same.)
I don't think that
primary voters are representative of the (potential or actual) American
electorate as a whole, nor does anyone who seriously studies these things.
[MORE ...]
But people - especially political consultants and the commentariat - love to
parcel Americans out into demographic groups. So in the interest of
helping divvy Americans into semi-distinct ideological groupings identified as
"Americas," here are ...
Americas
Three through Ten
(as I
currently conceive of them)
3. The 88.9% of
GOP voters who DON'T participate in the presidential nominating
process (Harvard)
4. The 81% of Dem voters who DON'T participate in the presidential nominating process (Harvard)
5. The unaffiliated
GOP-leaning eligible voters who don't participate in nomination battles
6. The unaffiliated Dem-leaning eligible voters who don't participate in nomination battles
7. The folks firmly in the middle, who actually do tend to vote for BOTH Dem and GOP candidates
8. The folks somewhere in
the middle, who are so turned off by politics that they either don't
participate or participate rarely in elections:
> About 56% of
the 30 million unregistered voting-age citizens said they weren't
registered because they weren’t interested in politics or candidates/issues on
the ballot, didn’t think their vote would make a difference, or didn’t know or
refused to answer why they weren’t registered (Census Bureau, p. 14)
> About 33% of
the 15 million who were registered but didn’t vote in the November
election said it was because they weren’t interested, didn’t like the
candidates or issues, or didn’t know or refused to answer why they didn’t vote
(same source.)
9. Radical folks on the
right who don't participate
> Just 53.1% of voting
age citizen Utahns and 56.1% of such Texans voted in the November 2008 General
Election (Census Bureau, p. 8.) I suspect these low
numbers are due in part to radical right opting-out, but a majority of these
states’ non-voting folks likely fall in groups 3 through 8.
10. Radical folks on the
left who don't participate
> Just 51.8% of
voting-age US citizens in Hawaii voted in November 2008 – perhaps this could be
somewhat due to radical left opting-out? (same source)
Okay, Ten or More
Americas isn’t as tidy a sorting system as Two Americas. Nor does it
create that fun, Hatfield vs. McCoys, us vs. them dichotomy that lends itself
to dramatic pronouncements about further evidence of the polarization of
America. But it does provide a much richer – and MUCH more accurate –
picture of the American people and our politics.
No comments:
Post a Comment